Notification [x]
"Earn a rebate everytime you shop online!"
Author Message
OFFLINE
Posted: 11/28/2008 03:01
Nothing is more motivational, nor creates more efficiency, than self-interest. This is why democratic capitalism is the leading world economic system. Government's role in this system is to assure fair play among the participants and to facilitate the development and maintenance of infrastructure elements necessary for commercial activity. The question in the instant crises is whether the financial services industry constitutes an infrastructure element, or a participant.

The financial services industry overextended itself by offering credit to people with insufficient motivation to pay back the loans. In so doing, they created false value in real estate for which there was inadequate demand. Like any other business that overestimates their market, they got caught holding too much inventory. In strict free-market terms, this would simply mean a discounted sell off of that inventory, perhaps by a bankruptcy court, or otherwise. If the entire industry failed, as so many have in the past, it would be unfortunate for those directly involved to be sure; but, historically speaking, a new, more highly evolved version usually emerges that better meets the needs of the consumer.

Our current problem is based on the fact that this excessive inventory has been passed on to our big money institutions. They have been left holding an inventory that has lost its value in the free market, and shows no signs of coming back. As a taxpayer, I'm not sure I want to buy something that I know is overpriced, and that I won't be able to sell at a reasonable profit.

On the other hand, the credit industry is a vital part of national and global free market economics. Loaned money creates a contract between the providers of goods and services, and their customers, that could not otherwise exist in an enforceable state. In local terms, if the bank on the corner fails and closes (rather than being bought out), I can't get my paycheck cashed. Consequently, the little guy has a vested interest in the survival of the big money institutions.

Some have said that there is plenty of private capital sitting on the sidelines waiting to scoop up these financial instruments when the price is right. The free market economic view would dictate that the government stay out of the mess and lets the private money step in when they see a bargain.

The question now for Congress and the President is not only what to do, but how much. They must protect the financial infrastructure, but sending too much money at the problem only continues to overvalue financial instruments for which the market is rapidly declining. If they stand back and wait for private capital to intervene based on bargain shopping, the institutions that support commerce my cease to exist.

Loud Noise Productions
Total Topics: 41 | Total Posts: 237
Today: 09/09/2010 12:56
Quick Search
Recent Posts
08/18/2010 14:26 by Harvey
08/18/2010 14:25 by Harvey
08/18/2010 06:35 by Human
05/21/2010 13:32 by Amelia
03/26/2010 13:02 by rufi
07/28/2009 12:29 by Lane
01/20/2009 21:23 by John
12/25/2008 22:53 by Thomas
11/28/2008 03:01 by Matthew
10/19/2008 20:45 by Jack
Political blogs Blog Directory & Search engine blog search directory